Author's note: This article is specially dedicated to the treasured, highly appreciated female readers of Straight Eye for the Straight Guy.
“I think the practice of wearing brands is indicative of a girl who is very ‘high-maintenance’. I personally wouldn’t go for such a girl. I'd prefer a more average down to earth person.” – Alvin, 20, Student.
"I don’t like women who wear brands just for the sake of wearing the brand. Women like to compare themselves with each other – you see one woman wearing Louis Vuitton, and another will follow by wearing Prada – it's just competition as to who can afford the more expensive brand. I mean, do people even genuinely think that brown LV pattern looks good? " - Steven, 34, Businessman.
A certain anonymous fellow went so far as to divide brands that women wear into 3 categories – red, yellow and green, the colours representing different alarm levels corresponding to the specific price range of individual brands. For example:
(Brand – Alarm Level – Course of Action)
Chanel, Burberry, Louis Vuitton – Red Alert - State of Emergency, run.
Zara, Topshop, GAP – Yellow Alert - Proceed with caution.
Unbranded – Green - PROCEED AT ALL COSTS.
"Well, I think clothing should be appropriate for the occasion. I mean, you don't have to be clad in designer brands every single time you go out, but let's say you see a girl walking down the street and she's all dressed up in Chanel, Burberry, etc - branded goods do come with a mark of quality and it adds a certain gloss to a woman's appearance. Honestly I don't really pay attention to the brands a woman is wearing, I pay attention to how good her clothes look on her. And I won't decide on the 'high-maintenance' part until I actually get to know her." - Teck How, 22, Single-if-you're-hot.
"Being myself, although I like elegant things and women who know how to take care of themselves, women who enjoy wearing designer brands scare me off. It's probably because I stereotype them as high-maintenance, shopping addicts. A female friend of mine once told me that ladies want to marry a man who can support them financially, as in a man who can pay for their shopping! I was like, "Wth, what's the low/average income guy gonna do then?"
Women of this kind usually have good fashion/style sense, so they'll expect you to look equally as good around them to complement them. Even the romantic experience with this sort of woman would be different. Handmade gifts to touch the heart will probably piss them off and be received as an indication of you being tight with your wallet.
So, yeah, its a turn off." - A very long answer by Franch, 22, Student.
"To me, it's not a matter of what she wears - it's how she wears it, tak kisah designer, pasar malam or standard clothes" - Shazlan, 23, Female enthusiast.
"I think it really depends on the woman's perspective towards designer brands. If they grew up wearing designer diapers, they're probably used to it and there's nothing much we can say. But if they do it to feign richness when in fact they aren't, then it can be a complete turn off..." - Anonymous, 21, Bohemian Stranger.
The responses seem to show a mixed set of opinions regarding the question at hand. However, a popular consensus seems to indicate that most men appear to be tolerant of women who are into designer labels for the sheer appreciation of the aesthetic value of the products, instead of women who go the way of the designer simply as a status symbol. In that sense, it isn't inaccurate to argue that for every man who negatively stereotypes a woman for wearing labels, there are also a substantial number who in fact associate designer labels with attractiveness, confidence and capability.
In conclusion, ladies, wear what makes you feel comfortable, what makes you feel good about yourself. If that Vera Wang dress is the only thing standing between you and true happiness, then by all means, go for it. After all, at the end of the day, it's all about being happy with who you are... isn't it? Leave your 2 cents as a comment.
11 comments:
haha i sincerely think women dress well for other women than anything else. guys usually do not notice your 180quid cavalli bracelet, women do!
hi tze ching! yeah, that's a very valid statement.. a lot of women do dress up to impress other women (impressing men being only ancillary). in fact, i don't even know what a cavalli bracelet looks like myself :/
Eh..why you only ask guys point of view nia? my question is why is it ok for to guys to splurge on electronic stuffs..like few hundreds..even thousands on a cell phone..but for girls to spend that much on designer stuff ..people think it's high maintenance and all that crap. can't it be that one just simply appreciates how pretty and well made certain designer items are? :) and you know you aren't paying for the brand, you are paying for the quality as well.. and some are just classic pieces will def last you a last time.
you are right about one thing tho, shouldn't wear it to impress others, but instead of how good it makes you feel :)
anonymous,
thats an excellent observation, i appreciate your opinion! :)
hahaha perhaps i should qualify that the purpose of the article was actually to gauge a man's perspective toward women who enjoy purchasing designer products, and not to embark on a discourse of the virtues of wearing designer or not.
and yeah i do agree with you that designer products are often of good long lasting make and quality. But perhaps one way of thinking is that the line has to be drawn when the price of the product greatly outweighs the practicality of purchasing it? feel free to leave your thoughts.
i sat next to an american designer based in HK on my flight back from the US, and i asked him what's rocking the shit in fashion these days. his reply was, "i think a lot more people are moving away from expensive brands and are in fact taking more pride in picking up equally great-looking bargains. which explains the success of the sarah jessica parker-inspired $15 dress and the Starbury shoes"
there you go, straight from the industry.
barry: that's brilliant! really la, consider guest writing for me :D it would be an honour
Judging by the pattern on her head, the woman in the first photo of this book looks like she's Native American or American Indian--not Indian like the description says.
You're normally so articulate, so I felt I should PC you if what I thought was right.
magstermash: i dropped by your blog, it's impressive. how about a collaboration sometime :)?
you're right, i was referring to american indian by the word "indian", but I probably should have made it more specific in light of the accepted stereotypical view that "indian" represents the people of India.
Thanks magstermash, I appreciate the comment! :D
Check This OutSource newssites useful referencetheir explanation
replica bags los angeles replica bags nancy replica bags online shopping india
k3h39d8a26 g9e07c7j19 f5f44h7r81 w4j25s0i38 e1p58h6z22 z3m69t9h92
Post a Comment